AleeanPeace Q2 10-Q: Going Concern Warning and Material Weaknesses
Summary
AleeanPeace Group Holdings reported zero revenue, a $7,588 net loss, and a going concern warning in its Q2 2026 10-Q. The company also disclosed material weaknesses in internal controls.
Key Events · Earnings and Guidance · SEAV
-
Going Concern Warning
Management states substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern within one year, citing a net loss of $7,588, accumulated deficit of $1,100,764, and negative operating cash flow of $18.
-
Zero Revenue
The company reported no revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, and has not generated any revenue to date.
-
Material Weaknesses
Disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to material weaknesses: inadequate segregation of duties and insufficient written policies for accounting and financial reporting.
-
Cash Position
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $447 as of June 30, 2026, down from $465 at year-end 2025.
Analysis · SEAV · Trade & Services
With no revenue, only $447 in cash, and an accumulated deficit of $1.1 million, the company faces substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern within one year, according to management. The filing also discloses material weaknesses in internal controls, including inadequate segregation of duties. While the company is pivoting to family office services, it has not yet generated any revenue from the new business.
How filings like this one have moved
In the 30 days to Aug 22, 2026, 37.5% of the 3496 measured filings Wiseek scored 8 moved their stock by 5% or more by the next session's close. The median move was 0.00%. These are measured outcomes after filings of this importance, not a forecast for this one.
Measured one observation per ticker per day, after exclusions. Current figures: Filing Impact Tracker · open dataset
At the time of this filing, SEAV was trading at $0.09 on OTC in the Trade & Services sector, with a market capitalization of approximately $4.2M. This filing was assessed with negative market sentiment and an importance score of 8 out of 10.